<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Look and Feel</title>
	<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/</link>
	<description>Some Thoughts on Photography - From an Everyday Amateur</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ana</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-225</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-225</guid>
					<description>I have site ( http://www.anakcourt.com/ ) that I have no clue how to manage. I know nothing about this stuff, so there it sits.....  I want to make it into something better, but I am not very good at this kind of thing.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have site ( <a href='http://www.anakcourt.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.anakcourt.com/</a> ) that I have no clue how to manage. I know nothing about this stuff, so there it sits&#8230;..  I want to make it into something better, but I am not very good at this kind of thing.  Sigh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: garyx</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-205</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-205</guid>
					<description>I don’t disagree with you on the image size, and that is something I will eventually get round to changing.

Interesting your comments about the roll over link, my original idea rolled to a black background with white letter, which I actually prefer. I can’t remember why I ended up like this, but I think this was an easy way out of a CSS conflict I had at the time. Its worth looking again anyway to see if I can run with the original concept.

Thanks for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t disagree with you on the image size, and that is something I will eventually get round to changing.</p>
<p>Interesting your comments about the roll over link, my original idea rolled to a black background with white letter, which I actually prefer. I can’t remember why I ended up like this, but I think this was an easy way out of a CSS conflict I had at the time. Its worth looking again anyway to see if I can run with the original concept.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-186</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-186</guid>
					<description>Gary - I like your page design - it is simple and clean.

Teo things would make it better IMO

1. Bigger images
2. I find the crossing out of links on rollover upsetting for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary - I like your page design - it is simple and clean.</p>
<p>Teo things would make it better IMO</p>
<p>1. Bigger images<br />
2. I find the crossing out of links on rollover upsetting for some reason.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: garyx</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-178</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-178</guid>
					<description>My site style is based on Time Out's Film Guide 2004 and developed using Textpad. Publishing is managed by Movabletype and MySQL.

I use #333 as my background colour, which is what www.28mm.org started out with, and the background colour I prefer to see my own pictures displayed with online.

I like to keep things simple, uncluttered, so that the image is the focus of attention and not the site style. I use a 500 pixel wide image because I built my site with 800x600 resolutions in mind. Now that resolutions are larger, I have considered offering a bigger image, but so far I have avoided the temptation.

One area of my site that I do plan to develop is the comment pop-up, where I store additional information and links about the image a visitor is viewing, but this will only be to improve the layout/format.

My favourite Photoblog in terms of presentation was Rachael James Mood-Indigo.net now www.brownglasses.com (top of my favourites list). Rachael has a way with websites, the same as she does with her Photography; simple yet breathtaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site style is based on Time Out&#8217;s Film Guide 2004 and developed using Textpad. Publishing is managed by Movabletype and MySQL.</p>
<p>I use #333 as my background colour, which is what <a href='http://www.28mm.org' rel='nofollow'>www.28mm.org</a> started out with, and the background colour I prefer to see my own pictures displayed with online.</p>
<p>I like to keep things simple, uncluttered, so that the image is the focus of attention and not the site style. I use a 500 pixel wide image because I built my site with 800&#215;600 resolutions in mind. Now that resolutions are larger, I have considered offering a bigger image, but so far I have avoided the temptation.</p>
<p>One area of my site that I do plan to develop is the comment pop-up, where I store additional information and links about the image a visitor is viewing, but this will only be to improve the layout/format.</p>
<p>My favourite Photoblog in terms of presentation was Rachael James Mood-Indigo.net now <a href='http://www.brownglasses.com' rel='nofollow'>www.brownglasses.com</a> (top of my favourites list). Rachael has a way with websites, the same as she does with her Photography; simple yet breathtaking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-167</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-167</guid>
					<description>Dave - I agree with the simplicity and lack of flashyness - it is the pictures we are all out to see.

Emma - I agree, some sites with clever designs are frustrating if one does not know where to find the comment button or navigate around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave - I agree with the simplicity and lack of flashyness - it is the pictures we are all out to see.</p>
<p>Emma - I agree, some sites with clever designs are frustrating if one does not know where to find the comment button or navigate around.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: emma</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-160</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-160</guid>
					<description>I use pixelpost because i can't write code and it had that simple template I was looking for having started on blogger, but not liked the small image display.

I have put the image information into the comment box and added a thumbnail of the image within this box too, but that is the extent of my tinkering (well boyfriends tinkering really). Personally I prefer viewing in white or black, so I may add a black option to the site at some stage, other than that I am perfectly happy with it.

As far as other blogs go - as long as the site is simple and does not detract from the image I don't mind what it looks like. I like to be able to quickly see where to leave a comment and can get frustrated when some things like that can't be found quickly. I also quite like the way some blogs have all the comments on display actually on the page, I think this works quite well.

Emma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use pixelpost because i can&#8217;t write code and it had that simple template I was looking for having started on blogger, but not liked the small image display.</p>
<p>I have put the image information into the comment box and added a thumbnail of the image within this box too, but that is the extent of my tinkering (well boyfriends tinkering really). Personally I prefer viewing in white or black, so I may add a black option to the site at some stage, other than that I am perfectly happy with it.</p>
<p>As far as other blogs go - as long as the site is simple and does not detract from the image I don&#8217;t mind what it looks like. I like to be able to quickly see where to leave a comment and can get frustrated when some things like that can&#8217;t be found quickly. I also quite like the way some blogs have all the comments on display actually on the page, I think this works quite well.</p>
<p>Emma
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Kapp</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-156</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-156</guid>
					<description>To me site design is important. I don't like flashy annoying sites filled with clutter. I've been to a few blogs like this, but found it too distracting I couldn't focus on the images. I never returned. 

I like a simple layout with a bit of style. Black, white &#38; grey are all good to my eyes, and really display photos nicely. Of course there are exceptions to the rules, but not many. 

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me site design is important. I don&#8217;t like flashy annoying sites filled with clutter. I&#8217;ve been to a few blogs like this, but found it too distracting I couldn&#8217;t focus on the images. I never returned. </p>
<p>I like a simple layout with a bit of style. Black, white &amp; grey are all good to my eyes, and really display photos nicely. Of course there are exceptions to the rules, but not many. </p>
<p>Dave
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-150</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-150</guid>
					<description>Mari - your site does buck the trend so far that neutral colours (ie white through grey to black) are preferred. I like it though as the power does not dominate the images.

I agree with you about scrolling, particularly where I cannot get the whol image on screen however I scroll (I suspect my vertical imaes are a problem for some).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mari - your site does buck the trend so far that neutral colours (ie white through grey to black) are preferred. I like it though as the power does not dominate the images.</p>
<p>I agree with you about scrolling, particularly where I cannot get the whol image on screen however I scroll (I suspect my vertical imaes are a problem for some).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mari</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-148</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-148</guid>
					<description>I agree with many things said above.

I personaly took the "pepper" version and did a bit a tweaking. http://www.nievesdesign.com/f8/  Just changing the fonts to your liking and some positioning in the layout helps out a great deal to make it your own. It's all in the details. Color, size, link positioning.

The design does help "ease" the experience. Doen't need to be flashy. Simple much better than going crazy with too much clutter. You may have beautiful pictures but if your site is a bit annoying to look at and is awful to navigate, cause I keep on having to scroll down to see the previous photo, well, I probably won't go back unless the photos are exceptional and I really enjoy seeing them.

Just my 2¢.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many things said above.</p>
<p>I personaly took the &#8220;pepper&#8221; version and did a bit a tweaking. <a href='http://www.nievesdesign.com/f8/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nievesdesign.com/f8/</a>  Just changing the fonts to your liking and some positioning in the layout helps out a great deal to make it your own. It&#8217;s all in the details. Color, size, link positioning.</p>
<p>The design does help &#8220;ease&#8221; the experience. Doen&#8217;t need to be flashy. Simple much better than going crazy with too much clutter. You may have beautiful pictures but if your site is a bit annoying to look at and is awful to navigate, cause I keep on having to scroll down to see the previous photo, well, I probably won&#8217;t go back unless the photos are exceptional and I really enjoy seeing them.</p>
<p>Just my 2¢.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris V.</title>
		<link>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-146</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.morvenphoto.co.uk/words/2005/09/27/site-look-and-feel/#comment-146</guid>
					<description>I wholeheartedly agree I need to make some improvements to the look and feel of my photoblog. But with a photoblog, it should be the photos that are important, not necessarily the design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree I need to make some improvements to the look and feel of my photoblog. But with a photoblog, it should be the photos that are important, not necessarily the design.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
